OpenHands vs Claude Code
Updated : the last week a score, rank or safety result on this page changed.
- Maintenance 30%7277
- Adoption 30%6282
- Docs 20%6920
- Community 20%, not measured yet––
OpenHands scores 3 points higher. OpenHands leads on docs; Claude Code leads on maintenance and adoption.
What this does not tell you
Scores are percentiles of public GitHub signals. Nobody here tested these tools hands-on, so the higher score is not a verdict on which suits your project. Yellow marks the higher value.
Which one fits you
From measured data and licences, not from testing.
Pick OpenHands if
- You rely on thorough README docs (docs 69 vs 20).
- You need a permissive open-source licence (MIT).
Pick Claude Code if
- Recent activity and releases matter most to you (maintenance 77).
- You want the more widely adopted option (adoption 82).
Safety side by side
Automated scan, 2 Nov 2026. Not a manual audit.
- CautionOpenHandsSkill/agent file instructs piping a remote script into a shell: .agents/skills/frontend-development/references/guide.md
- No dependencies scannedClaude CodeCode checks clean, no lockfile to check
Why different labels?
A label partly reflects how much of each tool is visible and scannable, not only how risky it is. A tool without a lockfile cannot get a dependency check.
- OpenHands: Skill/agent file instructs piping a remote script into a shell: .agents/skills/frontend-development/references/guide.md — curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
- Claude Code: code and instruction-file checks found nothing, but there is no runtime lockfile or manifest, so dependencies were not checked
Repo facts
Yellow = the higher value, where higher is better.
| Fact | OpenHands | Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68 | 65 |
| Stars | 92,466 | 154,199 |
| Last push | 2 Nov | 1 Nov |
| Releases, 90 days | 10+ | 10+ |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary (Anthropic Commercial Terms) |
| Open source | Open source | Proprietary |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Type | Agent framework | AI tool |
| Runs locally | yes | yes |
| Hosted option | unknown | mentioned |
“Runs locally” and “Hosted option” are read from each README automatically (or from the official docs where noted); “unknown” means no evidence was found, not that it is absent.
Questions about OpenHands vs Claude Code
Answers use this week's StackGrade data.
OpenHands or Claude Code: which scores higher on StackGrade?
OpenHands scores 3 points higher in Week 45: OpenHands 68, Claude Code 65 out of 100. The score combines maintenance, adoption and docs (percentiles of public GitHub signals): OpenHands 72, 62 and 69; Claude Code 77, 82 and 20. Community (20% weight) is not measured yet. It is not a hands-on test, so a higher score does not say which tool suits your project.
Is OpenHands or Claude Code safer to use?
Safety labels from the automated scan of 2 Nov 2026: OpenHands: Caution, skill/agent file instructs piping a remote script into a shell: .agents/skills/frontend-development/references/guide.md; Claude Code: No dependencies scanned, code checks clean, no lockfile to check. “No dependencies scanned” means the code checks were clean but there is no lockfile, so dependencies could not be checked; it is not a clean bill. It is an automated scan, not a manual audit.
Which is more widely used, OpenHands or Claude Code?
By GitHub stars: Claude Code 154,199, OpenHands 92,466. Adoption score (percentile among all 52 tracked tools): OpenHands 62, Claude Code 82. Stars are one public signal and do not measure real-world use.
Which licences do OpenHands and Claude Code use?
OpenHands: MIT; Claude Code: Proprietary (Anthropic Commercial Terms). Read each licence text before commercial use.
Should I pick OpenHands or Claude Code?
Pick OpenHands if you rely on thorough README docs (docs 69 vs 20); you need a permissive open-source licence (MIT). Pick Claude Code if recent activity and releases matter most to you (maintenance 77); you want the more widely adopted option (adoption 82). This comes from measured public data and licences only, not from hands-on testing.
Full comparison table, every criterion
| OpenHandsOpenHands/OpenHands | Claude Codeanthropics/claude-code | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68 | 65 |
| Rank | #10 overall · #3 in use case | #11 overall · #4 in use case |
| Maintenance (30%) | 72 | 77 |
| Adoption (30%) | 62 | 82 |
| Docs (20%) | 69 | 20 |
| Community (20%) | not measured | not measured |
| Safety | Caution
| No dependencies scanned |
| License | MIT | Proprietary (Anthropic Commercial Terms) |
| Open source | Open source | Proprietary |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Stars | 92,466 | 154,199 |
| Last push | ||
| Type | Agent framework | AI tool |
| Runs locally | yes (README: "npm install -g") | yes (README: "npm install -g") |
| Hosted option | unknown | mentioned (official docs: code.claude.com/docs/en/claude-code-on-the-web) |
Get the board every Monday
One email a week: the new top 10, the biggest score changes and every safety label that changed.
Free. Double opt-in: you confirm by email first, unsubscribe in one click.