Automation & agent frameworks artemis
Is artemis safe?
Short answer: Caution. StackGrade's weekly scan of google/artemis gives it a Caution label for 7 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV). It does list 61 high-severity advisories in runtime dependencies, which don't change the label. Critical advisories are counted once per package; a known issue in a locked package version does not prove artemis is exploitable in your setup. Automated scan of commit 351ca84 on 2 Nov 2026, not a manual audit.
Updated : the last week its score, rank or safety result changed.
Google's tool that turns natural-language instructions into Android automation.
- 16,143 stars
- pushed 1 Oct
- Apache-2.0
- Python
#50of 52 overall#14in Automation & agent frameworks▲ 1 vs Week 44
- Maintenance 30%14
- Adoption 30%6
- Docs 20%69
- Community 20%–
Score over the last 4 weeks: 24, 23, 24, 25.
7 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV).
How this score works
Each part is a percentile among all 52 tracked tools, so 50 is average for this list. Community is not measured yet; the score uses the other 80%.
- Maintenance: Last push 1 Oct 2026. No GitHub releases, no release pace measured. Median 77.4 h to close an issue (9 closed issues).
- Adoption: 16,143 stars (70%), 1,762 forks (30%).
- Docs: README 17,747 characters, 24 headings, 8 code blocks, install section: yes.
#14 of 14 in Automation & agent frameworks
Ranked by score. The yellow row is this tool.
- 1n8n#3 overall70Caution
- 2AutoGPT#14 overall62Caution
- 3CrewAI#18 overall57Caution
- 4Dify#20 overall56Caution
- 5LangChain#23 overall54Caution
- 6Pydantic AI#31 overall46Caution
- 7Mastra#33 overall44No issues found
- 8LangGraph#34 overall44No issues found
- 9Agent Development Kit (ADK, Python)#36 overall43Caution
- 10OpenBot#39 overall41Caution
- 11AutoGen#41 overall40Caution
- 12OpenAI Agents SDK (Python)#42 overall39Caution
- 13smolagents#47 overall30No dependencies scanned
- 14artemis#50 overall25Caution
Safety scan, 2 Nov 2026
Automated scan of commit 351ca84, 719 files. Not a manual audit.
Caution
- 7Critical dependency advisories61 high, 46 medium, 7 low. OSV, runtime dependencies only.
- 0Install hooksNo npm install scripts found.
- 0Remote-code patternsFor example eval(fetch(…)).
- 130Agent files checked0 phrases flagged for review.
- 4curl | sh installersIn docs or program code. Information only.
Why this label?
Why this label:
- 7 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
Known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV): 7 critical, 61 high, 46 medium, 7 low
certifi@2026.7.22 (PYSEC-2026-4320) in uv.lockpillow@12.3.0 (PYSEC-2026-4330) in uv.lockpillow@12.3.0 (PYSEC-2026-4332) in uv.lockpillow@12.3.0 (PYSEC-2026-4339) in uv.lockpillow@12.3.0 (GHSA-332p-7hrc-92wf) in uv.lock
Also found (informational, does not change the label):
- 61 high-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
- Program code runs a curl|sh style installer (4 occurrences, e.g. scripts/install_deps.ps1)
- Skill scripts contact: www.apache.org, 127.0.0.1, localhost
Notes:
- 21 affected packages only in dev/test/docs manifests, not counted
- Telemetry/analytics references in code: telemetry
Automated scan of commit 351ca84 on 2 Nov 2026, not a manual audit. 719 files checked. What we check
Repo activity
From the GitHub API, fetched 2 Nov 2026.
- 0GitHub releasesNo release in the public feed.
- 3dMedian issue closeOver 9 closed issues
- 16.1kStars+1,300 since 26 Oct
- 1.8kForks180 open issues
- 2026Repo created13 Aug 2026
Questions about artemis
Answers use this week's StackGrade data.
Is artemis safe to use?
Caution. StackGrade's weekly scan of google/artemis gives it a Caution label for 7 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV). It does list 61 high-severity advisories in runtime dependencies, which don't change the label. Critical advisories are counted once per package; a known issue in a locked package version does not prove artemis is exploitable in your setup. Automated scan of commit 351ca84 on 2 Nov 2026, not a manual audit.
How does StackGrade score artemis?
artemis scores 25 out of 100 in Week 45: #50 of 52 tracked tools overall and #14 in Automation & agent frameworks. The score combines maintenance (14), adoption (6) and docs (69) as percentiles among all 52 tracked tools; community (20% weight) is not measured yet, so the score uses the other 80%. It is not a hands-on test and it is separate from the safety label.
What are the alternatives to artemis?
What licence does artemis use?
The licence listed for google/artemis is Apache-2.0. Read the licence text before commercial use.
Compare and use it
Side by side
AI use cases
All facts and sources
- Type
- AI tool
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Language
- Python
- Created
- 13 Aug 2026
- Owner
- google (Organization)
- Forks
- 1,762
GitHub description: “ARTEMIS turns natural-language instructions into reliable Android automation. It automates end-to-end workflows, captures logs, and integrates seamlessly with AI coding assistants such as Antigravity, Codex, and Claude Code. It also achieves 99%+ success rate on AndroidWorld Benchmark.”
Sources: github.com/google/artemis, api.github.com/repos/google/artemis, raw.githubusercontent.com/google/artemis/main/README.md. Fetched 2 Nov 2026.
Know when artemis changes label
One email a week: the new top 10, the biggest score changes and every safety label that changed.
Free. Double opt-in: you confirm by email first, unsubscribe in one click.