Week 45, updated 2 Nov 2026

Compare Automation & agent frameworks

AutoGPT vs CrewAI

Updated : the last week a score, rank or safety result on this page changed.

AutoGPT

62

#14 overall, #2 in Automation & agent frameworks

Caution

  • Maintenance 30%5562
  • Adoption 30%9145
  • Docs 20%2969
  • Community 20%, not measured yet––

CrewAI

57

#18 overall, #3 in Automation & agent frameworks

Caution

AutoGPT scores 5 points higher. AutoGPT leads on adoption; CrewAI leads on maintenance and docs.

What this does not tell you

Scores are percentiles of public GitHub signals. Nobody here tested these tools hands-on, so the higher score is not a verdict on which suits your project. Yellow marks the higher value.

Which one fits you

From measured data and licences, not from testing.

Pick AutoGPT if

  • You want the more widely adopted option (adoption 91).

Pick CrewAI if

  • Recent activity and releases matter most to you (maintenance 62).
  • You rely on thorough README docs (docs 69 vs 29).
  • You need a permissive open-source licence (MIT).

Safety side by side

Automated scan, 2 Nov 2026. Not a manual audit.

  • CautionAutoGPT16 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
  • CautionCrewAI8 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
Why different labels?

A label partly reflects how much of each tool is visible and scannable, not only how risky it is. A tool without a lockfile cannot get a dependency check.

  • AutoGPT: 16 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
  • CrewAI: 8 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)

Repo facts

Yellow = the higher value, where higher is better.

FactAutoGPTCrewAI
Score6257
Stars187,86160,400
Last push2 Nov1 Nov
Releases, 90 days10+10+
LicenceMIT + Polyform ShieldMIT
Open sourceMixed license (MIT + Polyform Shield)Open source
LanguagePythonPython
TypeAgent frameworkAgent framework
Runs locallyyesyes
Hosted optionmentionedunknown

“Runs locally” and “Hosted option” are read from each README automatically (or from the official docs where noted); “unknown” means no evidence was found, not that it is absent.

Questions about AutoGPT vs CrewAI

Answers use this week's StackGrade data.

AutoGPT or CrewAI: which scores higher on StackGrade?

AutoGPT scores 5 points higher in Week 45: AutoGPT 62, CrewAI 57 out of 100. The score combines maintenance, adoption and docs (percentiles of public GitHub signals): AutoGPT 55, 91 and 29; CrewAI 62, 45 and 69. Community (20% weight) is not measured yet. It is not a hands-on test, so a higher score does not say which tool suits your project.

Is AutoGPT or CrewAI safer to use?

Safety labels from the automated scan of 2 Nov 2026: AutoGPT: Caution, 16 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV); CrewAI: Caution, 8 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV). It is an automated scan, not a manual audit.

Which is more widely used, AutoGPT or CrewAI?

By GitHub stars: AutoGPT 187,861, CrewAI 60,400. Adoption score (percentile among all 52 tracked tools): AutoGPT 91, CrewAI 45. Stars are one public signal and do not measure real-world use.

Which licences do AutoGPT and CrewAI use?

AutoGPT: MIT + Polyform Shield; CrewAI: MIT. Read each licence text before commercial use.

Should I pick AutoGPT or CrewAI?

Pick AutoGPT if you want the more widely adopted option (adoption 91). Pick CrewAI if recent activity and releases matter most to you (maintenance 62); you rely on thorough README docs (docs 69 vs 29); you need a permissive open-source licence (MIT). This comes from measured public data and licences only, not from hands-on testing.

Full comparison table, every criterion
AutoGPT vs CrewAI, data from 2 Nov 2026
 AutoGPTSignificant-Gravitas/AutoGPTCrewAIcrewAIInc/crewAI
Score62 57
Rank#14 overall · #2 in use case#18 overall · #3 in use case
Maintenance (30%)5562
Adoption (30%)9145
Docs (20%)2969
Community (20%)not measurednot measured
Safety Caution
  • 16 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
Caution
  • 8 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
LicenseMIT + Polyform ShieldMIT
Open sourceMixed license (MIT + Polyform Shield)Open source
LanguagePythonPython
Stars187,86160,400
Last push
TypeAgent frameworkAgent framework
Runs locallyyes (README: "docker run")yes (README: "uv tool install")
Hosted optionmentioned (README: "Sign up for ")unknown

Get the board every Monday

One email a week: the new top 10, the biggest score changes and every safety label that changed.

Free. Double opt-in: you confirm by email first, unsubscribe in one click.