Week 45, updated 2 Nov 2026

Compare Automation & agent frameworks

n8n vs AutoGPT

Updated : the last week a score, rank or safety result on this page changed.

n8n

70

#3 overall, #1 in Automation & agent frameworks

Caution

  • Maintenance 30%8155
  • Adoption 30%9691
  • Docs 20%1629
  • Community 20%, not measured yet––

AutoGPT

62

#14 overall, #2 in Automation & agent frameworks

Caution

n8n scores 8 points higher. n8n leads on maintenance and adoption; AutoGPT leads on docs.

What this does not tell you

Scores are percentiles of public GitHub signals. Nobody here tested these tools hands-on, so the higher score is not a verdict on which suits your project. Yellow marks the higher value.

Which one fits you

From measured data and licences, not from testing.

Pick n8n if

  • Recent activity and releases matter most to you (maintenance 81).
  • You want the more widely adopted option (adoption 96).

Pick AutoGPT if

  • You want the higher README docs score (docs 29 vs 16).

Safety side by side

Automated scan, 2 Nov 2026. Not a manual audit.

  • Cautionn8n3 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
  • CautionAutoGPT16 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
Why different labels?

A label partly reflects how much of each tool is visible and scannable, not only how risky it is. A tool without a lockfile cannot get a dependency check.

  • n8n: 3 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
  • AutoGPT: 16 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)

Repo facts

Yellow = the higher value, where higher is better.

Factn8nAutoGPT
Score7062
Stars209,320187,861
Last push2 Nov2 Nov
Releases, 90 days10+10+
LicenceSustainable Use LicenseMIT + Polyform Shield
Open sourceSource-available (Sustainable Use License)Mixed license (MIT + Polyform Shield)
LanguageTypeScriptPython
TypeAI toolAgent framework
Runs locallyyesyes
Hosted optionunknownmentioned

“Runs locally” and “Hosted option” are read from each README automatically (or from the official docs where noted); “unknown” means no evidence was found, not that it is absent.

Questions about n8n vs AutoGPT

Answers use this week's StackGrade data.

n8n or AutoGPT: which scores higher on StackGrade?

n8n scores 8 points higher in Week 45: n8n 70, AutoGPT 62 out of 100. The score combines maintenance, adoption and docs (percentiles of public GitHub signals): n8n 81, 96 and 16; AutoGPT 55, 91 and 29. Community (20% weight) is not measured yet. It is not a hands-on test, so a higher score does not say which tool suits your project.

Is n8n or AutoGPT safer to use?

Safety labels from the automated scan of 2 Nov 2026: n8n: Caution, 3 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV); AutoGPT: Caution, 16 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV). It is an automated scan, not a manual audit.

Which is more widely used, n8n or AutoGPT?

By GitHub stars: n8n 209,320, AutoGPT 187,861. Adoption score (percentile among all 52 tracked tools): n8n 96, AutoGPT 91. Stars are one public signal and do not measure real-world use.

Which licences do n8n and AutoGPT use?

n8n: Sustainable Use License; AutoGPT: MIT + Polyform Shield. Read each licence text before commercial use.

Should I pick n8n or AutoGPT?

Pick n8n if recent activity and releases matter most to you (maintenance 81); you want the more widely adopted option (adoption 96). Pick AutoGPT if you want the higher README docs score (docs 29 vs 16). This comes from measured public data and licences only, not from hands-on testing.

Full comparison table, every criterion
n8n vs AutoGPT, data from 2 Nov 2026
 n8nn8n-io/n8nAutoGPTSignificant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
Score70 62
Rank#3 overall · #1 in use case#14 overall · #2 in use case
Maintenance (30%)8155
Adoption (30%)9691
Docs (20%)1629
Community (20%)not measurednot measured
Safety Caution
  • 3 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
Caution
  • 16 critical-severity known vulnerabilities in runtime dependencies (OSV)
LicenseSustainable Use LicenseMIT + Polyform Shield
Open sourceSource-available (Sustainable Use License)Mixed license (MIT + Polyform Shield)
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Stars209,320187,861
Last push
TypeAI toolAgent framework
Runs locallyyes (README: "curl -fsSL https://get.n8n.io | sh")yes (README: "docker run")
Hosted optionunknownmentioned (README: "Sign up for ")

Get the board every Monday

One email a week: the new top 10, the biggest score changes and every safety label that changed.

Free. Double opt-in: you confirm by email first, unsubscribe in one click.